YOUR FIRST CAN.

 
 
Can’t decide what your first suppressor should be? Here’s a few things to consider to get the most bang for your buck.
We make a large variety of suppressors. Some are multi-caliber and some are dedicated to a specific caliber and platform. Ask yourself, am I looking for the performance of a dedicated caliber suppressor? Or do you need something that can be used on a variety of platforms and a variety of calibers?

Scenario time! Let’s say you have a 9mm pistol you want to suppress. It’s the main gun you practice with at the range and your main home defense gun. Our Spectre 9 is a great option to chose for a dedicated caliber suppressor. The advanced design and titanium construction keeps the suppressor extremely lightweight, small and very quiet.

On the other hand, if you want to shoot a variety of platforms and calibers, something like our Omega 36M or Hybrid 46M is a great fit. The Omega 36M can work on both rifles and handguns, accommodating calibers ranging from 5.7MM to .338 LPM.

If rimfire is more your jam, you can choose from a classic like our Sparrow 22, or something more versatile like our Switchback 22.

Check out our full lineup of suppressors here to see these options and many more.

Just remember, are you looking for performance and dedication for one caliber or platform? Or do you need something a little more versatile and multi platform ready. Start there, and you can’t go wrong with any SilencerCo suppressor. Whatever you decide, you’ll be getting the best quality, support, and warranty in the suppressor industry.

-WE HAVE THE SILENCERSHOP KIOSK IN HOUSE FOR YOUR SUPPRESSOR PURCHASING CONVIENANCE

ABQ GUNS – 505-899-1144 6301 RIVERSIDE PLAZA LN NW STE 3, ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87120

SB318, the gun store liability bill

SB318, the gun store liability bill that could put every gun store in NM out of business by enabling frivolous lawsuits against firearms industry companies, advanced out of the House Judiciary Committee today after a few amendments were made. The amendments were clarifying language suggested by the Attorney General’s Office (New Mexico Department of Justice) and language from the House Judiciary Committee to expand liability to companies in other industries. The bill still singles out the firearms industry, but it is expanding the Unfair Trade Practices Act to more companies that sell products in New Mexico and increasing penalties for everyone. The next stop for the bill is the House Floor for a vote by all members of the New Mexico House of Representatives. If it passes the House side, it will have to go back to the Senate Floor for concurrence as the bill was amended.

Despite being listed first on the agenda, SB279, the gas-operated firearm and magazine ban, wasn’t heard in the Senate Finance Committee today in either of their meetings. The committee has no more meetings scheduled. It is possible the bill could be pulled from the committee and sent straight to the floor if it is going to have a vote by the full Senate in the closing hours of the 2025 Legislative Session.

There is just a day and a half left in the 2025 Legislative Session. SB318 is being pushed very hard as it is seen as the best chance to pass a major gun-control law this session.

Please continue to contact your representatives and senators and tell them to do everything they can to stop the bill.

Stop this bill in the house!!

After a floor vote on SB318 was delayed last Thursday, the bill was brought up again on the Senate Floor tonight for a vote and was passed 21 to 18.

Numerous gun stores from around the state have told us the bill could put every gun store in New Mexico out of business. The bill accomplishes this by amending New Mexico’s Unfair Trade Practices Act to make it easier to sue a gun store than any other type of business and imposing harsher penalties on gun stores than any other type of business.

Further, the bill states: “proof of monetary damage, loss of profits or intent to deceive or take unfair advantage of any person is not required” to sue a gun store or manufacturer. Activist groups who hate the Second-Amendment would be given free rein to sue New Mexico gun stores until the stores are forced to close. No other state in the country targets gun stores in this extreme manner.

The bill now heads to the House Side. We expect it will stop in the House Judiciary Committee first, followed by a floor vote if it passes that committee. We have only days left in the 2025 Legislative Session, so we must act quickly if we are going to stop SB318. First, the contact info for House Judiciary Committee Members is at the bottom of this email. Second, find and contact your state representative, and tell them to oppose SB318.

The 2025 Session ends at noon on Saturday, so this will be sprint to the end. Here is a quick rundown of the other bills we are tracking now. SB279, the gas-operated firearm and magazine ban is still sitting in the Senate Finance Committee and has not moved in over a week. HB12, the red-flag gun confiscation law expansion has passed both the House and Senate and is on its way to the Governor. The courts will ultimately be where this type of law will have to be fought. SB507, the concealed carry act rewrite will be in the House Judiciary Committee tomorrow, 3/19, after passing the Senate side.

House Judiciary Committee

Christine Chandler – (D) christine.chandler@nmlegis.gov 505-986-4411
Andrea Romero – (D) andrea@andrearomero.com 505-986-4243
Javier Martínez – (D) javier.martinez@nmlegis.gov 505-986-4782
Matthew McQueen – (D) matthew.mcqueen@nmlegis.gov 505-986-4423
Andrea Reeb – (R) Andrea.Reeb@nmlegis.gov 505-986-4215
Reena Szczepanski – (D) reena.szczepanski@nmlegis.gov 505-986-4777
Michelle Paulene Abeyta – (D) michelle.abeyta@nmlegis.gov 505-986-4254
Nicole Chavez – (R) nicole.chavez@nmlegis.gov 505-986-4214
William A. Hall II – (R) bill.hall@nmlegis.gov 505-986-4336
Dayan Hochman-Vigil – (D) dayan.hochman-vigil@nmlegis.gov 505-986-4777
Alan T. Martinez – (R) Alan.Martinez@nmlegis.gov 505-986-4758

TOP these bills! SB318 and SB279

With just a few days left, urgent action is needed to stop two bad bills that are still making their way through the legislature. We need a maximum effort to STOP these bills! SB318, Firearms In Unfair Trade Practices, was put on the agenda just hours before the Senate floor met last night. A vote wasn’t taken, but it will debated this morning on the Senate floor and voted on.

Do you want to see: your favorite small business be forced to close, or large retailers move out of New Mexico and \online retailers large and small stop selling products in New Mexico? If SB318 passes the legislature and becomes law that’s what will happen, SB318: targets all New Mexico businesses (except cannabis), increases fines for unfair trade practices from $5000 to $25,000, increases damage awards from $100 to $30,000 and unfairly increases fines and damage awards to $30,000 for the firearms industry. To stop SB318, use the link below to tell you Senator to vote “NO”.

New Mexico Senate Bill 279 (SB279) is an extreme gun control measure that seeks to ban a wide range of commonly owned firearms and standard-capacity magazines.

The bill includes: A ban on so-called “assault weapons,” which includes many commonly owned semi-automatic rifles, shotguns, and handguns. A ban on standard-capacity magazines over 10 rounds, which are commonly used for self-defense, competitive shooting, and hunting.

A retroactive possession ban, meaning that law-abiding gun owners who already own these firearms and magazines could be forced to give them up, face confiscation, or risk becoming criminals overnight.

Why is SB279 Bad? It Criminalizes Law-Abiding Citizens This bill does nothing to stop violent criminals but instead targets responsible gun owners who use these firearms for self-defense, sport shooting, and hunting.

It Violates the Second Amendment   The Supreme Court has ruled in cases like D.C. v. Heller and Bruen that bans on commonly owned firearms are unconstitutional. SB279 is an overreach that will likely face legal challenges.

It Does Not Improve Public Safety   Criminals do not follow gun laws, and banning these firearms will not stop violent crime. Instead, it leaves law-abiding citizens defenseless.

It Hurts New Mexico’s Economy   Many gun stores, firearm manufacturers, and shooting sports businesses rely on the sale of these firearms and magazines. This bill could drive them out of business or out of the state.

It Sets the Stage for Further Gun Control   Once this type of ban is in place, anti-gun lawmakers will likely push for even stricter laws, such as mandatory registration, increased restrictions on handguns, and more.  

Bottom Line SB279 is an unconstitutional gun ban that punishes law-abiding citizens while doing nothing to stop crime. Instead of restricting the rights of responsible gun owners, New Mexico should focus on enforcing existing laws against violent criminals.

Here is a letter that you can use as a guide, feel free to modify it in your own words. A revised letter with SB318 and SB279 included
[Your Name] [Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Your Email]
[Your Phone Number]
[Date]
  [Legislator’s Name] [Legislator’s Office Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
 

Dear [Legislator’s Name], I am writing to urge you to oppose Senate Bill 318 and Senate Bill 279, both of which threaten the rights of law-abiding gun owners and businesses in New Mexico. Senate Bill 318 seeks to impose excessive liability on firearm manufacturers and retailers by allowing lawsuits against them for the criminal misuse of legally sold firearms. This legislation unfairly targets a lawful industry and sets a dangerous precedent that could be extended to other industries.

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) was enacted at the federal level to prevent such abuses, and SB318 is a direct attempt to undermine those protections. Holding manufacturers and retailers accountable for crimes they did not commit is unjust and could ultimately drive gun businesses out of New Mexico, negatively impacting jobs and the economy.

Senate Bill 279 is an extreme gun ban that would outlaw commonly owned semi-automatic rifles, standard-capacity magazines over 10 rounds, and other firearms used by law-abiding citizens for self-defense, hunting, and competitive shooting.

This bill does nothing to address crime but instead criminalizes responsible gun owners while doing little to improve public safety. Law-abiding New Mexicans should not have their constitutional rights stripped away because of the actions of criminals.

As your constituent, I urge you to stand up for the Second Amendment and oppose these misguided bills.

Please vote NO on SB318 and SB279 and work toward policies that protect both public safety and the rights of law-abiding New Mexicans.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response on this critical issue. Sincerely, [Your Name]

Urgent action needed to stop two bad bills!!

ABQ GUNS  and the NEW MEXICO FIREARMS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION To PROTECT, PRESERVE and PROMOTE the firearms industry in New Mexico newmexicofia.org
Urgent action needed to stop two bad bills that are making their way through the legislature. We need a maximum effort to STOP these bills!   SB318 FIREARMS IN UNFAIR PRACTICES ACT Firearms In Unfair Trade Practices, was put on the agenda just hours before the Senate floor met last night. A vote wasn’t taken, but it will debated this morning on the Senate floor and voted on.   Do you want to see: your favorite small business be forced to close, or large retailers move out of New Mexico and online retailers large and small stop selling products in New Mexico?

If SB318 passes the legislature and becomes law that’s what will happen, SB318: targets all New Mexico businesses (except cannabis), increases fines for unfair trade practices from $5000 to $25,000, increases damage awards from $100 to $30,000 and unfairly increases fines and damage awards to $250,000 for the firearms industry.   To stop SB318, use the link below to tell you Senator to vote “NO”.  

SB279 GO SAFE ACT GOSAFE, is currently waiting to be heard in the Senate Tax, Business, and Transportation Committee.   If SB217 passes the legislature you will: be required to register your AR rifle and other gas operated firearms, not be allowed to hunt or shoot your gas operated firearm on public land, not be able to buy or sell a gas operated firearm, have a limit of 10 rounds for all magazines and  

Contact members of the Senate Tax, Business and Transportation Committee and ask them to oppose this bill.   Here is a letter that you can use as a guide, feel free to modify it in your own words.   [Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Your Email]
[Your Phone Number]
[Date] [Legislator’s Name]
[Legislator’s Office Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]  


            Dear [Legislator’s Name], I am writing to urge you to oppose Senate Bill 318 and Senate Bill 279, both of which threaten the rights of law-abiding gun owners and businesses in New Mexico. Senate Bill 318 seeks to impose excessive liability on firearm manufacturers and retailers by allowing lawsuits against them for the criminal misuse of legally sold firearms. This legislation unfairly targets a lawful industry and sets a dangerous precedent that could be extended to other industries. The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) was enacted at the federal level to prevent such abuses, and SB318 is a direct attempt to undermine those protections. Holding manufacturers and retailers accountable for crimes they did not commit is unjust and could ultimately drive gun businesses out of New Mexico, negatively impacting jobs and the economy. Senate Bill 279 proposes additional restrictions on firearm transfers and ownership, imposing unnecessary burdens on responsible gun owners. The bill does little to prevent crime and instead creates more bureaucratic red tape for law-abiding citizens exercising their constitutional rights. New Mexico should focus on enforcing existing laws rather than enacting new, restrictive measures that only hinder responsible gun owners. As your constituent, I urge you to stand up for the Second Amendment and oppose these misguided bills. Please vote NO on SB318 and SB279 and work toward policies that protect both public safety and the rights of law-abiding New Mexicans. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response on this critical issue.   Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your City, State]

Act Now to Save NM Gun Stores

While SB279, the gas-operated firearm and magazine ban, has been idling in the Senate Finance committee for a week, SB318 has been fast-tracked in Santa Fe. The bill could put every gun store in New Mexico out of business by amending New Mexico’s Unfair Trade Practices Act to make it easier to sue a gun store than any other type of business and imposing harsher penalties on gun stores than any other type of business.

Further, the bill states: “proof of monetary damage, loss of profits or intent to deceive or take unfair advantage of any person is not required” to sue a gun store. Activist groups who hate the Second-Amendment would be given free rein to sue New Mexico gun stores until they were forced to close.

No other state in the country targets gun stores in this extreme manner, but trial attorneys who have a grip on the New Mexico Legislature have put gun stores in their sights looking for a payday.

What can you do right now? First, find and contact your state legislators, and tell them to oppose SB318 as it is on the Floor of the Senate with a vote by all State Senators scheduled for tomorrow. Second, forward this message to anyone, especially FFLs who need to be aware of what is happening in Santa Fe right now.

You all NEED to get involved NOW!

logo

NEW MEXICO FIREARMS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION To PROTECT, PRESERVE and PROMOTE the firearms industry in New Mexico newmexicofia.org
Dear 2nd Amendment Supporter, Two dangerous bills, SB279 and SB318, are advancing in the New Mexico Legislature, posing a direct threat to both law-abiding gun owners and the firearms industry in our state. We must take immediate action to stop them.

SB279 – The Gun & Magazine Ban Late Friday night, SB279, the so-called “gas-operated firearm and magazine ban,” was pushed through the Senate Judiciary Committee on a 5-4 vote after numerous revisions—many of which were only made public the day before the vote. The bill now moves to the Senate Finance Committee, a committee where similar bills have never been heard before. Today 3/12/2025 🚨 Why This Matters: This bill is an extreme gun ban that would criminalize the possession of commonly owned semi-automatic firearms and standard-capacity magazines. The process has lacked transparency, with lawmakers rushing through major revisions without public scrutiny. There is concern that this bill may be pushed directly to the Senate floor, bypassing Senate Finance altogether.   SB318 – A Direct Attack on Firearm Retailers

On Saturday, SB318, a bill designed to cripple the firearms industry, was rushed through the Senate Tax, Business & Transportation Committee. It is now scheduled for a hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Today, March 12, 2025. 🚨 Why This Matters: This bill unfairly targets firearm retailers and manufacturers, making them more vulnerable to lawsuits than any other industry. Gun shop owners have testified that if SB318 passes, they will be unable to obtain insurance and will be forced out of business. The real intent of this bill is to bankrupt firearm businesses and strip New Mexicans of their Second Amendment rights.  

What You Can Do: 1️⃣ Contact Your Senators – Tell them to VOTE NO on SB279 and SB318. Demand they protect your rights and oppose these extreme bills. Find your senator here: [Insert link to legislator contact information]

2️⃣ Attend the Hearings – If possible, attend the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on SB318 on 3/12. SB279 is scheduled for a hearing today Also!

3️⃣ Spread the Word – Share this email with fellow gun owners, firearm retailers, and Second Amendment supporters. We cannot allow radical anti-gun legislators to erode our freedoms. Stand with us and make your voice heard!

Thank you for your support, Eric Rasmussen
President
New Mexico Firearms Industry Association
newmexicofia.org
If you do not wish to receive future emails from the New Mexico Firearms Industry Association, Please use the unsubscribe link at the bottom of the page and you will be immediately removed. Thank You View email in browser
New Mexico Firearms Industry Association · 11200 Montgomery Blvd NE Ste 10 · Albuquerque, NM 87111-2679 · USA

OPPOSE SB 318 and SB 279

To opt out of NRA-ILA FrontLines emails, click here
Senate Bill 318 (Industry Liability) was on the agenda for yesterday’s Senate Judiciary Committee meeting; however it was never brought up for consideration. The committee will meet again on Wednesday March 12, where it could be considered. There is less than two weeks remaining in the 2025 legislative session, so it is critical that all NRA members and Second Amendment advocates stay active and engaged. Legislation can move at a moments notice! Please use the “Take Action” button below to contact members of the committee and urge them to OPPOSE SB 318.



Senate Bill 318 expands the New Mexico Unfair Practices Act to include firearms, parts, and accessories, imposing severe penalties of $250,000 per violation and holding manufacturers, distributors, and online platforms jointly liable for actions by third parties. It allows private lawsuits without proof of harm and grants sweeping authority to the Attorney General to pursue civil penalties.

This overreach increases compliance costs, threatens lawful businesses with excessive litigation, and raises serious constitutional and interstate commerce concerns, all while doing little to address criminal misuse of firearms.

ALSO, Senate Bill 279 was passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee late Friday night and has now been referred to the Senate Finance Committee, but has not yet been scheduled. 

Senate Bill 279 seeks to regulate and prohibit the possession of a wide range of semiautomatic firearms commonly used by law-abiding citizens for recreation, hunting, self-defense, and competitive shooting. Among the multiple regulations placed on law-abiding New Mexicans, those who currently possess firearms covered by the bill would be required to register with the state by January 1, 2026, to continue to lawfully possess them, enabling the creation of a firearm owner registry.

A firearm owner must have the certification notarized and must carry their copy of the certification outside their own property. Licensed firearm dealers will have to mark firearms, maintain records of certifications, and make these available for law enforcement inspection. Starting January 1, 2026, possession of these firearms would be prohibited, with limited exceptions. This legislation threatens to criminalize responsible gun owners and undermine constitutional rights.

As the clock ticks down, please stay tuned to your inbox as NRA-ILA keeps you updated on the happenings at the Roundhouse! If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to email me at Clay@nrailafrontlines.com. Yours in Freedom, Clay Kimberling
New Mexico NRA-ILA Grassroots Coordinator
Clay@nrailafrontlines.com
(703) 943-6566
https://www.nrailafrontlines.com/

STOP THESE BILLS

2025 NEW MEXICO LEGISLATIVE SESSION
Anthony Segura NMSSA Executive Director, New Mexico Shooting Sports Association   As of February 25, 2025, the statuses of New Mexico Senate Bills 279 and 318 are as follows:   Senate Bill 279 (SB 279): Gas-Operated Semiauto Firearms Exclusion Act Introduction Date: February 4, 2025   New Mexico Senate Bill 279 (SB 279), introduced on February 4, 2025, by Senators Micaelita Debbie O’Malley, Heather Berghmans, Andrea Romero, Charlotte Little, and Patricia Roybal Caballero, is officially titled the “Gas-Operated Semiauto Firearms Exclusion Act.” The bill seeks to regulate and potentially prohibit the possession, sale, and transfer of certain gas-operated semiautomatic firearms within the state.   Key provisions of SB 279 include: Prohibited Actions: The bill makes it unlawful to import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or receive specific gas-operated semiautomatic firearms. The Attorney General, in consultation with the Department of Public Safety, is tasked with identifying and publishing a list of prohibited firearms by July 1, 2025.   Certification System: Owners of affected firearms are required to obtain certification through a system developed by the Attorney General. This process involves completing a certification form and, if done before January 1, 2026, submitting it to a licensed firearm dealer or directly to the Attorney General. Post-January 1, 2026, all certifications must be submitted directly to the Attorney General.   Possession Restrictions: Certified firearms may only be possessed on private property owned or controlled by the individual, at licensed shooting ranges, or during sanctioned shooting competitions. Transportation of these firearms is limited to direct routes between such locations.   Penalties: Violations of the proposed regulations are classified as a fourth-degree felony, carrying potential legal consequences for offenders.   The introduction of SB 279 has ignited significant debate. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary measure to address gun violence and enhance public safety. Senator O’Malley, the lead sponsor, emphasized growing concerns about gun violence, stating, “I do think this is the right thing to do.”   Opponents, including the National Rifle Association (NRA), the New Mexico Shooting Sports Association (NMSSA), and the New Mexico Firearms Industry Association contend that the bill infringes upon Second Amendment rights and could criminalize law-abiding gun owners. They highlight that many commonly owned firearms used for hunting, competitive shooting, and self-defense could fall under the ban. John Commerford, executive director of the NRA Institute for Legislative Action, described SB 279 as “one of the most extreme gun control bills in the country.”   As of February 24, 2025, SB 279 has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee for further deliberation. Stakeholders and the public are closely monitoring its progress, given its potential impact on firearm ownership and regulation in New Mexico.   Senate Bill 318 (SB 318): Firearms in Unfair Practices Act Introduction Date: February 7, 2025 Sponsor: Senator Joseph Cervantes Current Status: Referred to the Senate Tax, Business and Transportation Committee (STBTC) on February 7, 2025 Summary: SB 318 could negatively impact gun stores in New Mexico. By amending the state’s Unfair Practices Act to include provisions related to firearms and destructive devices, the bill could open the door for lawsuits against gun stores and manufacturers based on vague or broadly defined “unfair” trade practices. This would increase legal liability for lawful firearm businesses, potentially leading to higher operating costs, insurance premiums, and even business closures.   Gun control advocates have used similar legislative tactics in other states to bypass federal protections like the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which shields firearm businesses from frivolous lawsuits. If SB 318 passes, it could be weaponized by anti-gun groups to sue firearm dealers and manufacturers for crimes committed by third parties, even when the businesses followed all laws.   The New Mexico Firearm Industry Association, NMSSA and other pro-2A organizations oppose SB 318 because it could cripple the firearms industry in New Mexico, making it harder for residents to legally purchase and own guns.
Send a letter to your Legislator’s opposing these two Senate Bills.   Subject: Oppose SB 279 & SB 318 – Protect Our Second Amendment Rights Dear [Legislator’s Name], As a fellow New Mexican and a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, I urge you to vote NO on Senate Bill 279 (the Gas-Operated Semiauto Firearms Exclusion Act) and Senate Bill 318. These bills threaten the rights of law-abiding gun owners while doing little to enhance public safety. SB 279 would regulate and potentially ban a broad range of semiautomatic firearms that are commonly used for self-defense, hunting, competitive shooting, and recreation. Criminalizing responsible gun owners does not reduce crime—it only punishes law-abiding citizens while failing to address the root causes of violence. SB 318 expands the New Mexico Unfair Practices Act to include firearms, parts, and accessories, imposing excessive penalties of $250,000 per violation and holding manufacturers, distributors, and online sellers jointly liable for third-party actions. This bill would: Allow lawsuits without proof of harm, encouraging frivolous litigation. Subject out-of-state and online retailers to New Mexico laws, creating serious interstate commerce concerns. Grant broad enforcement power to the Attorney General, threatening lawful businesses with crushing legal costs. Rather than targeting responsible gun owners and businesses, the Legislature should focus on enforcing existing laws and addressing the real drivers of violent crime. I strongly urge you to oppose SB 279 and SB 318 and protect the constitutional rights of New Mexicans. Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address or City, Optional]
[Your Contact Information]

RECENT COURT DECISIONS ON THREE KEY SECOND AMENDMENT ISSUES

  RECENT COURT DECISIONS ON THREE KEY SECOND AMENDMENT ISSUES  

From felony bans to waiting periods and permit fees, courts across the country are addressing the limits of an individual’s rights under the Second Amendment, with varying outcomes. In Vincent v. Bondi, the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (with jurisdiction over the Mountain West and Plains States and headquartered in Colorado) reaffirmed its stance that felons — violent or not — can still be barred from firearm possession. Meanwhile, in Beckwith v. Frey, a federal district court in Maine granted a preliminary injunction against the state’s 72-hour waiting period law, finding it an unconstitutional burden on an individual’s rights. And finally, in People v. Brown, an Illinois state court struck down the state’s Firearm Owner’s Identification (“FOID”) card requirement, holding that forcing law-abiding citizens to pay fees to exercise their Second Amendment rights is unconstitutional. These cases highlight ongoing legal battles shaping the future of Second Amendment related rights in America as a result of two recent cases decided by the United States Supreme Court.  

In Vincent v. Bondi, the plaintiff challenged her prohibition on firearm possession under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) due to her conviction for bank fraud, a non-violent crime. The Tenth Circuit, which had previously upheld the prohibition, heard the matter again because the Supreme Court had agreed to review the first decision, but then sent it back to the Tenth Circuit to review again following the Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. Rahimi. Ultimately, the Tenth Circuit panel reaffirmed its prior decision finding that longstanding prohibitions on felons, violent or non-violent, possessing firearms is constitutional. The Tenth Circuit panel further found that Rahimi did not change its analysis, and ultimately rejected Vincent’s argument.   In Beckwith v. Frey, a judge from the U.S. District Court for Maine was asked to review whether the state’s new law requiring a 72-hour waiting period before delivery of a firearm was unconstitutional. The plaintiffs, including firearm dealers and individuals seeking to purchase firearms, sought a preliminary injunction and argued that the law violates the Second Amendment. The court ruled that the law lacks narrow, objective, and definite standards, and that its blanket application contradicts constitutional protections. Significantly, the court found that even this temporary deprivation of the Second Amendment would result in irreparable injury. While the plaintiffs were able to secure the early injunction, the matter will now continue into discovery, and ultimately, a final decision.  

Finally, in People v. Brown, a state court judge was asked to review an Illinois law that requires any person who possesses a firearm to hold a FOID card. The defendant, who had no criminal record and was otherwise eligible to have and possess a firearm and obtain a FOID card pursuant to Illinois law, was charged with possession of a firearm in her own home without having a FOID card. Ultimately, the court found these requirements unconstitutional “on their face and as applied to law-abiding citizens,”  and that defendant’s activity of simply possessing a firearm within the confines of her home is an act protected by the Second Amendment, for which she cannot be criminally charged. Significantly, the court even took issue with the fees associated with the FOID card and held that “any fee associated with exercising the core fundamental constitutional right of armed self-defense within the confines of one’s home violates the Second Amendment.”   Renzulli Law Firm will continue to monitor these cases and provide future updates as they are received. If you have any questions about cases involving the Second Amendment or the firearms industry, please contact John F. Renzulli or Christopher Renzulli.

Renzulli Law Firm is Monitoring Firearm-Related Legislative Developments

Renzulli Law Firm, nationally recognized as one of the premier law firms in the country serving the Firearms Industry, is monitoring legislative developments affecting the industry and publishing regular updates which are available by e-mail and on the Firm’s website. 
 

Our firearms legislation updates are available here.  Additional information about the Firm’s litigation, counseling and consulting services for the Firearms Industry is available here.