![]() 2A News Should Transgenders Have Their Firearms Confiscated? A recent AmmunitionToGo survey at the 2024 National Rifle Association Annual Meetings in Dallas, Texas, stirred up a big question: Should transgenders have their firearms confiscated? Nearly 1,000 attendees weighed in, offering a peek into the diverse opinions within the NRA’s crowd. While the NRA claims to have five million members, some board members and […] Click here to read more Harris Taps Walz for VP, Anti-2A Activists Celebrate Today, Vice President Kamala Harris announced her selection of Gov. Tim Walz (D-Minn.) as her 2024 running mate. Click here to read more ![]() Fourth Circuit Upholds Maryland’s AWB The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) isn’t backing down. After the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Maryland’s assault weapons ban, SAF announced plans to take the fight to the Supreme Court. In Bianchi v. Wilkinson, SAF challenges this ban, insisting it’s unconstitutional. Click here to read more GOA Sues Florida Over Open Carry Ban Gun Owners of America (GOA), Inc., Gun Owners Foundation, and Richard Hughes have taken a bold step to protect the Second Amendment. Click here to read more ‘Feels like a setup!’ — Former Sniper on Trump Assassination Attempt In a recent interview on the PBD podcast, renowned Army Ranger sniper Nick Irving, known for his 33 confirmed kills and extensive experience protecting high-profile figures, shared his concerns about the current state of the Secret Service. Click here to read more Column Olympic Shotgunner Wins Gold Again. So Meta Shut Him Down. Armed America: This Week’s Top Defensive Gun Use Story Montana Man Shoots Grizzly Bear That Attacked Him Industry News Record Gun Sales for Five Straight Years! CrossBreed Introduces the ‘Reign’ Adjustable IWB Holster The HoneyB from Bond Arms Reviews You Missed Sig P320XF BXR3 // Full Review InfiRay Outdoor M6T Review: The Rooftop Sentinel for Night Hunters ![]() If you no longer wish to receive mail from us, you can Unsubscribe 1914 Skillman St. Suite 110 #313 Dallas, TX 75206 |
NM Department of Game and Fish
![]() |
Upcoming Events – August 2024 The Department is excited to host various public events in the upcoming months. Please check out these opportunities to build your skills. You can see all of the Department’s upcoming events on our website. |
Happy National Shooting Sports Month! August is National Shooting Sports Month, with events nationwide promoting shooting sports participation and safe firearms handling. Shooters can also take the +ONE pledge and introduce someone to the world of recreational shooting for the first time. | ![]() |
This is the perfect month to get out and practice safe shooting, sight in your rifle before hunting season or just have some fun with friends and family. A list of shooting ranges in New Mexico can be found here. |
![]() | Beginner Shotgun Shooting Clinic Registration is currently open for the Department of Game and Fish’s upcoming Beginner Shotgun Shooting Clinic, which will take place Aug. 16-17 at the Stephen M. Bush Memorial Shooting Range in Clayton. The clinic, which is open to anyone age 12 and older, will provide |
participants with the opportunity to learn shotgun skills from trained staff. Shotguns, ammunition and targets will be provided. Those interested must register in advance by clicking here. The clinic will take place from 4-7 p.m. Aug. 16 and from 8 a.m.-noon Aug. 17. Participants under the age of 18 must be accompanied by an adult. |
A Rising Star in Archery Deming High School student Ashlynn McGinnis is one of the nation’s best high school female archers, having finished second in the 2024 National Archery in the Schools Program (NASP) IBO/3-D National Open Championship in Florida in June. McGinnis’ performance comes on the heels of second-place finishes in the New Mexico State 3-D and Bullseye Championship, and she was also the highest-finishing New Mexican at the | ![]() |
Western National Championship in Salt Lake City. Way to go! For more about Ashlynn’s successful season and her path to becoming one of the country’s best young archers, click here. |
![]() | Safe Storage Saves Lives To ensure household safety and prevent unauthorized access, it is critical that gun owners practice responsible storage. Safe storage goes beyond simply hiding guns in closets or drawers. To practice safe storage, unloaded firearms should be secured in a locked cabinet, safe, gun vault, or storage case. These storage locations should be inaccessible to |
children to minimize the risk of accidents or misuse. Additionally, utilizing gun locking devices can render firearms inoperable and provide an extra layer of security, and can be used as a complement to locked storage. If firearms are disassembled, it is important to store the parts securely in separate locations. It is essential to store ammunition in a separate, locked location away from firearms. This separation helps minimize the possibility of accidental discharge or unauthorized use. Always remember to double-check firearms thoroughly to confirm that they are unloaded when removing them from storage, as accidents can occur if a firearm is returned to storage loaded. Visit safestoragenm.org to order a free gun lock today! Upcoming Events Aug. 9 – State Game Commission Meeting at Bataan Hall in Taos. Click here for more information. Aug. 10 – Fly Fishing 101 Class at Eagle Nest Lake State Park. Click here for more information. Aug. 10 – Thirst for the Outdoors Adventure Fair at Canteen Brewery in Albuquerque. Click here for more information. Aug. 16-17 – Beginner Shotgun Shooting Clinic at Stephen M. Bush Memorial Shooting Range in Clayton. See above for more information. Aug. 24 – Hunter Education Instructor Training at the Department’s Southwest Area Office in Las Cruces. Click here for more information. To learn more about the Department’s educational opportunities, including aquatic/fishing education, conservation education, hunter education, off-highway vehicle and target and 3-D archery, please visit the Department’s website. ![]() ![]() |
Springfield Armory HELLCAT Promo
Come over to meet Joshua Neal
You’re Invited! |
CLICK HERE TO RSVP |
Dear Friends and Supporters, I am excited to announce that we have a special guest speaker for our upcoming fundraiser, Zac Fort! |
Zac is the treasurer and legislative affairs connection for the New Mexico Shooting Sports Association, and he comes highly recommended. He will be sharing his insights on the rich history of firearms, providing a unique and informative perspective that you won’t want to miss. Join us for an evening of engaging discussions and support for our campaign! |
![]() |
PRE-REGISTRATION REQUIRED |
Come and Join Us! Please RSVP at your earliest convenience, and feel free to bring friends and family who share our vision for a better New Mexico. To RSVP safely and securely online, please click the button below that says “Click here to RSVP”. To donate by Check or by Cash, please contact Debbie Reynolds. Debbie Reynolds (505) 238-1721 debbiereynolds711@gmail.com Thank you for your continued support. I look forward to seeing you at the event on August 10th! Warm regards, |
![]() |
Joshua Neal Conservative Candidate for NM House District 17 c. 505-457-8142 | e. nealfornm@gmail.com Connect: www.nealfornm.com |
CLICK HERE TO RSVP |
the waiting period law is consistent with discriminatory historical laws restricting firearms sales to slaves, freedmen, and American Indians.
![]() To opt out of NRA-ILA Front Lines emails, click here Last week, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico denied a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in Ortega v. Grisham, the case challenging New Mexico’s law requiring a 7-day waiting period before an individual can take possession of a firearm they purchased. To secure a win on this motion, the plaintiffs had to establish that they are likely to succeed on the merits of the case, that they are likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in their favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest. The court first determined that the plaintiffs are unlikely to succeed on the merits because (1) the Second Amendment does not protect purchasing firearms and (2) the waiting period law is consistent with discriminatory historical laws restricting firearms sales to slaves, freedmen, and American Indians. Because the court concluded that there was no violation of constitutional rights, the plaintiffs could not satisfy the remaining factors either. Therefore, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion. The plaintiffs will now consider whether to appeal the decision to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals or proceed on the merits in the district court. Please stay tuned as NRA-ILA continues to fight for your Second Amendment rights, and please click HERE to learn about current litigation NRA-ILA is involved in. Yours in Freedom, Clay Kimberling New Mexico NRA-ILA Grassroots Coordinator Clay@nrailafrontlines.com (703) 943-6566 https://www.nrailafrontlines.com/ NRA-ILA Grassroots · 11250 Waples Mill Rd, Fairfax, VA 22030, United States This email was sent to info@abqguns.com. To stop receiving emails, click here. |
MLG ADMITS SHE HAS CREATED THE HIGEST RATE OF “GUN VIOLENCE”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92f4c/92f4c202bc3fa590e453bd50c476eae62f674da9" alt=""
Lets elect someone who will work for us for a change!
Dear Fellow Patriots,
I hope this message finds you well. As we move closer to the election, our campaign to bring new leadership to Albuquerque’s West Side District 17 is gaining momentum. I’m writing to invite you to a special fundraising event that will be crucial to our success in this race.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2c9c/c2c9c9ecdb103d55f24b55b9c08ddf88eb44cf55" alt=""
Join us for an evening of camaraderie, music, and community spirit. We will have free beer and wine, live music, and a silent auction with some fantastic items up for bid. This is not just a chance to have a good time, but also an opportunity to make a significant impact on the future of our district.
This race is incredibly important. For too long, our district has been under longstanding Democrat control. Now, we have the opportunity to flip this seat and ensure our voices are heard in the New Mexico House of Representatives. Your support can make a difference in achieving a victory that will bring positive change to our community.
Whether you can attend in person or contribute in other ways, your participation is vital. Together, we can build a stronger, more prosperous future for Albuquerque’s West Side.
Please RSVP at your earliest convenience, and feel free to bring friends and family who share our vision for a better New Mexico.
You can RSVP by texting or calling either 505-457-8142 or 505-238-1721, or by sending us an email at NealforNM@gmail.com.
Thank you for your continued support. I look forward to seeing you at the event!
Warm regards,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/294f2/294f2e4889992a6f5225b750b24bba6726720db0" alt=""
Joshua Neal
Conservative Candidate for NM House District 17
c. 505-457-8142 | e. nealfornm@gmail.com
Connect: www.nealfornm.com
P.S. If you can’t make it to the event but still want to support our campaign, please consider making a donation online at www.nealfornm.com. Every contribution helps us get one step closer to victory!
Let’s come together and make a difference!
WINNER WINNER FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!
In our Mock v. Garland ATF Pistol Brace Rule Lawsuit, the District Court has issued its decision and VACATED THE RULE!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe2c7/fe2c74aa0cb55d940fd7b6a66d578693b011e6ac" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d48c/7d48c8d7ed1d42148471608ad047c1ae8e7180fd" alt=""
PISCTOL BRACE RULE IS VACATED AND NOT VALID!
COURT COMPELS INSURANCE COMPANY TO PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR SHOOTING RANGE SUICIDE LITIGATION
COURT COMPELS INSURANCE COMPANY TO PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR SHOOTING RANGE SUICIDE LITIGATION A Delaware court recently ruled in favor of a shooting range, finding that its insurance liability policy covers claims arising from the range’s rental of a firearm. The court disagreed with the defendant insurance company that a “Rental of Sporting Equipment Exclusion” was permissible grounds to deny coverage under the policy. The case arises from a customer’s suicide at the Noble Eagle range in Delaware. The customer rented a firearm from the shooting range and used it to commit suicide. The customer’s family subsequently filed a lawsuit against the shooting range, alleging claims for negligence, negligent entrustment, and negligent training and supervision. But when Noble Eagle submitted the claim to its insurance company, coverage was denied, meaning it would not even provide a defense, pursuant to a “Rental of Sporting Equipment Exclusion.” Noble Eagle filed suit against its insurer seeking an order requiring it to provide a defense and indemnify it in the lawsuit brought by the family. The “Rental of Sporting Equipment Exclusion” of the insurance policy provided, in relevant part, “it is understood and agreed that this policy specifically excludes and does not extend to or provide coverage, indemnity, or defense costs for bodily injury or property damage arising out of the use of sporting equipment rented out by the insured.” Noble Eagle argued that the Exclusion was ambiguous because it did not define “sporting equipment” and, therefore, it is unclear whether it applied to rental firearms. The insurer argued that the provision was clear and unambiguous, and that the plain and ordinary definition of sporting equipment encompasses firearms. The court agreed with Noble Eagle that the provision was ambiguous, holding that it “cannot conclude all firearms are unequivocally and definitionally ‘sporting equipment.’” As such, the court granted summary judgment in favor of Noble Eagle and ordered the insurer to provide defense and indemnity for the claims alleged against Noble Eagle arising from the suicide. This case is an important reminder to all firearm industry members to pay attention to and read all common insurance policy exclusions that could provide a basis for the denial of coverage. In addition to the Rental of Sporting Equipment Exclusion at issue in the Noble Eagle case, some other typical exclusions in insurance policies include the Assault and Battery Exclusion, the Violation-of-Law exclusion, and even a Liquor Liability Exclusion, which may apply to certain shooting clubs and ranges. All industry members should discuss these issues with their insurance brokers, read these exclusions and know the potential effects (what type of claim might be excluded). This case also teaches a valuable lesson that all is not lost if an insurer initially disclaims coverage for an occurrence. If you believe an insurance policy provides coverage despite a disclaimer, there is a viable path to obtain coverage through the courts. Every case is different and will likely turn on the factual circumstances at issue, but it is important to remember that, when there is ambiguity in an insurance policy, the language is generally construed against the insurance company. Shooting ranges and dealers should also be mindful that they have a duty not to sell or rent firearms to patrons whom they know or should know are likely to use the firearm to harm themselves or others. Renzulli Law Firm consults with dealers and shooting ranges nationally on best practices to ensure that policies and practices are applied to exceed the standard of care and create a safer environment. In addition, the NSSF has partnered with the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention and they are a great resource for these issues. Renzulli Law Firm continues to monitor firearm litigation across the United States. If you have any questions about firearm industry insurance policies, litigation, or best practices for a shooting range, please contact John F. Renzulli or Christopher Renzulli. |
Our firearms legislation updates are available here. Additional information about the Firm’s litigation, counseling and consulting services for the Firearms Industry is available here.
FEDERAL COURT IN TEXAS GRANTS PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PREVENTING ATF FROM ENFORCING NEW “ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS” RULE
FEDERAL COURT IN TEXAS GRANTS PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PREVENTING ATF FROM ENFORCING NEW “ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS” RULE As RLF previously reported, on April 19, 2024, the ATF published a Final Rule regarding the definition of “engaged in the business” as a firearms dealer. The Final Rule, which went into effect on May 20, 2024, significantly expands the definition of who is required to have a federal firearms license and who is considered to be engaged in the business as a firearms dealer. The penalty for dealing in firearms without a license is up to five years in prison, a fine up to $250,000, or both, and the firearms involved or used are subject to seizure and forfeiture. Thus, the stakes are high if a person or entity violates the Final Rule. The ATF recently published a Guide on this issue, which states, “even if a person sold only a few firearms, or only a single firearm transaction was completed, if the person also represented to others a willingness and ability to purchase more firearms for resale, they would likely be engaged in the business.” Three separate lawsuits were filed in different federal courts challenging the constitutionality of the Final Rule. This week, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas granted the Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (expanding upon a previously issued Temporary Restraining Order), which, effective immediately, prohibits the ATF from enforcing the Final Rule against members of Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation, Tennessee Firearms Association, Virginia Citizens Defense League, and residents of Texas, Utah, Louisiana, and Mississippi. The ATF, however, can still enforce the Final Rule against any other individuals or entities that are not included in this list. The court reasoned that the Plaintiffs would suffer irreparable injury absent an injunction, particularly due to economic costs that would inevitably occur, as well as the civil and criminal enforcement actions that would ensue for engaging in conduct that the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (“BSCA”) permits, but the Final Rule “impermissibly forbids.” For example, the Final Rule asserts that there is no minimum number of firearms an individual or entity must sell in order to be considered engaged in the business. However, the BSCA contains its own definition of being engaged in the business, which significantly differs from the definition in the Final Rule. In addition, the Final Rule suggests that profit has no bearing upon whether one is “engaged in the business.” The BSCA, conversely, differentiates an attempt to obtain pecuniary gain, from improving or liquidating a personal firearms collection. The court’s decision memorialized every contradiction and inconsistency between the Final Rule and the BSCA. The next step in this litigation is likely an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which has been notably averse to the ATF’s overreach in the area of firearms regulation. The Northern District of Texas also issued a decision this week against the ATF in a case challenging the ATF’s “Pistol Brace” Rule, which, among other things, sets forth “when a device marketed as a stabilizing brace turns a pistol or handgun into a rifle.” Plaintiffs challenged this Final Rule on statutory and constitutional grounds. Initially, Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction was denied on the basis that they failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits, but the case was appealed, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the decision. The Fifth Circuit reasoned that the Final Rule was not a logical outgrowth of the Proposed Rule and deemed this a monumental and prejudicial error. The Fifth Circuit remanded the case back to the Northern District with specific instruction to assess certain factors of Plaintiffs’ Preliminary Injunction. The Northern District held that the Final Rule violated the Administrative Procedure Act, substantively and procedurally. The Court ruled that the proper remedy was to vacate the Final Rule in its entirety. In fact, the Court deemed the illegitimate agency action void ab initio (from the beginning). Renzulli Law Firm, LLP will continue to monitor the three cases challenging the ATF’s Final Rule and other challenges to firearm related statutes and regulations around the country. If you have any questions about the ATF’s Final Rule or these legal challenges, please contact John F. Renzulli or Christopher Renzulli. |
Our firearms legislation updates are available here. Additional information about the Firm’s litigation, counseling and consulting services for the Firearms Industry is available here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.