In our Mock v. Garland ATF Pistol Brace Rule Lawsuit, the District Court has issued its decision and VACATED THE RULE!

PISCTOL BRACE RULE IS VACATED AND NOT VALID!

COURT COMPELS INSURANCE COMPANY TO PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR SHOOTING RANGE SUICIDE LITIGATION   A Delaware court recently ruled in favor of a shooting range, finding that its insurance liability policy covers claims arising from the range’s rental of a firearm. The court disagreed with the defendant insurance company that a “Rental of Sporting Equipment Exclusion” was permissible grounds to deny coverage under the policy. The case arises from a customer’s suicide at the Noble Eagle range in Delaware. The customer rented a firearm from the shooting range and used it to commit suicide. The customer’s family subsequently filed a lawsuit against the shooting range, alleging claims for negligence, negligent entrustment, and negligent training and supervision. But when Noble Eagle submitted the claim to its insurance company, coverage was denied, meaning it would not even provide a defense, pursuant to a “Rental of Sporting Equipment Exclusion.” Noble Eagle filed suit against its insurer seeking an order requiring it to provide a defense and indemnify it in the lawsuit brought by the family.   The “Rental of Sporting Equipment Exclusion” of the insurance policy provided, in relevant part, “it is understood and agreed that this policy specifically excludes and does not extend to or provide coverage, indemnity, or defense costs for bodily injury or property damage arising out of the use of sporting equipment rented out by the insured.” Noble Eagle argued that the Exclusion was ambiguous because it did not define “sporting equipment” and, therefore, it is unclear whether it applied to rental firearms. The insurer argued that the provision was clear and unambiguous, and that the plain and ordinary definition of sporting equipment encompasses firearms. The court agreed with Noble Eagle that the provision was ambiguous, holding that it “cannot conclude all firearms are unequivocally and definitionally ‘sporting equipment.’” As such, the court granted summary judgment in favor of Noble Eagle and ordered the insurer to provide defense and indemnity for the claims alleged against Noble Eagle arising from the suicide.   This case is an important reminder to all firearm industry members to pay attention to and read all common insurance policy exclusions that could provide a basis for the denial of coverage. In addition to the Rental of Sporting Equipment Exclusion at issue in the Noble Eagle case, some other typical exclusions in insurance policies include the Assault and Battery Exclusion, the Violation-of-Law exclusion,  and even a Liquor Liability Exclusion, which may apply to certain shooting clubs and ranges. All industry members should discuss these issues with their insurance brokers, read these exclusions and know the potential effects (what type of claim might be excluded). This case also teaches a valuable lesson that all is not lost if an insurer initially disclaims coverage for an occurrence. If you believe an insurance policy provides coverage despite a disclaimer, there is a viable path to obtain coverage through the courts. Every case is different and will likely turn on the factual circumstances at issue, but it is important to remember that, when there is ambiguity in an insurance policy, the language is generally construed against the insurance company.   Shooting ranges and dealers should also be mindful that they have a duty not to sell or rent firearms to patrons whom they know or should know are likely to use the firearm to harm themselves or others. Renzulli Law Firm consults with dealers and shooting ranges nationally on best practices to ensure that policies and practices are applied to exceed the standard of care and create a safer environment. In addition, the NSSF has partnered with the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention and they are a great resource for these issues.   Renzulli Law Firm continues to monitor firearm litigation across the United States. If you have any questions about firearm industry insurance policies, litigation, or best practices for a shooting range, please contact John F. Renzulli or Christopher Renzulli.

FEDERAL COURT IN TEXAS GRANTS PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PREVENTING ATF FROM ENFORCING NEW “ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS” RULE   As RLF previously reported, on April 19, 2024, the ATF published a Final Rule regarding the definition of “engaged in the business” as a firearms dealer. The Final Rule, which went into effect on May 20, 2024, significantly expands the definition of who is required to have a federal firearms license and who is considered to be engaged in the business as a firearms dealer. The penalty for dealing in firearms without a license is up to five years in prison, a fine up to $250,000, or both, and the firearms involved or used are subject to seizure and forfeiture. Thus, the stakes are high if a person or entity violates the Final Rule. The ATF recently published a Guide on this issue, which states, “even if a person sold only a few firearms, or only a single firearm transaction was completed, if the person also represented to others a willingness and ability to purchase more firearms for resale, they would likely be engaged in the business.”   Three separate lawsuits were filed in different federal courts challenging the constitutionality of the Final Rule. This week, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas granted the Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (expanding upon a previously issued Temporary Restraining Order), which, effective immediately, prohibits the ATF from enforcing the Final Rule against members of Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation, Tennessee Firearms Association, Virginia Citizens Defense League, and residents of Texas, Utah, Louisiana, and Mississippi. The ATF, however, can still enforce the Final Rule against any other individuals or entities that are not included in this list.   The court reasoned that the Plaintiffs would suffer irreparable injury absent an injunction, particularly due to economic costs that would inevitably occur, as well as the civil and criminal enforcement actions that would ensue for engaging in conduct that the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (“BSCA”) permits, but the Final Rule “impermissibly forbids.” For example, the Final Rule asserts that there is no minimum number of firearms an individual or entity must sell in order to be considered engaged in the business. However, the BSCA contains its own definition of being engaged in the business, which significantly differs from the definition in the Final Rule. In addition, the Final Rule suggests that profit has no bearing upon whether one is “engaged in the business.” The BSCA, conversely, differentiates an attempt to obtain pecuniary gain, from improving or liquidating a personal firearms collection. The court’s decision memorialized every contradiction and inconsistency between the Final Rule and the BSCA.  The next step in this litigation is likely an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which has been notably averse to the ATF’s overreach in the area of firearms regulation.   The Northern District of Texas also issued a decision this week against the ATF in a case challenging the ATF’s “Pistol Brace” Rule, which, among other things, sets forth “when a device marketed as a stabilizing brace turns a pistol or handgun into a rifle.” Plaintiffs challenged this Final Rule on statutory and constitutional grounds. Initially, Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction was denied on the basis that they failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits, but the case was appealed, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the decision. The Fifth Circuit reasoned that the Final Rule was not a logical outgrowth of the Proposed Rule and deemed this a monumental and prejudicial error. The Fifth Circuit remanded the case back to the Northern District with specific instruction to assess certain factors of Plaintiffs’ Preliminary Injunction. The Northern District held that the Final Rule violated the Administrative Procedure Act, substantively and procedurally. The Court ruled that the proper remedy was to vacate the Final Rule in its entirety. In fact, the Court deemed the illegitimate agency action void ab initio (from the beginning).   Renzulli Law Firm, LLP will continue to monitor the three cases challenging the ATF’s Final Rule and other challenges to firearm related statutes and regulations around the country. If you have any questions about the ATF’s Final Rule or these legal challenges, please contact John F. Renzulli or Christopher Renzulli.

Albuquerque Man Sentenced for Federal Firearm Offenses

Monday, June 10, 2024Share

For Immediate Release

U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of New Mexico

ALBUQUERQUE – Albuquerque man sentenced to 66 months in prison after pleading guilty to federal charges arising from the armed robbery of a Federal Firearms Licensee in Albuquerque in 2022.

There is no parole in the federal system.

According to court documents, on April 29, 2022, special agents from the ATF were notified of an armed robbery that occurred the previous day at the Big 5 Sporting Goods Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) located at 2720 San Mateo Blvd. NE in Albuquerque.

According to employees, Dawayne Yates, 53, entered the store and requested to inspect a rifle. After confirming his identity, an employee handed Yates a Ruger Mini-14 rifle. Yates then pulled out a handgun, pointed it at the employee, and demanded another rifle. Fearing for her life, the employee gave Yates an Dickinson, model XX3D-M-2, 12-gauge shotgun.

Yates stole both firearms, placing them in a gun case he took from the store, and fled in a vehicle with no license plate.

Fingerprint evidence from the crime scene matched Yates. A victim identified him from a photo lineup. On May 2nd, Yates was arrested at a local motel, where police recovered:

• A 9mm Taurus pistol matching the description of the gun used in the robbery
• A .22 caliber Remington rifle
• Ammunition
• Body armor
• Suspected fentanyl pills

The stolen firearms from Big 5 were not recovered. Yates has prior felony convictions prohibiting him from possessing firearms or ammunition.

After completing his term of imprisonment, Yates will be required to serve five years of supervised release.

U.S. Attorney Alexander M.M. Uballez and Brendan Iber, Special Agent in Charge of the Phoenix Field Division of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, made the announcement today.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives investigated this case with assistance from the Albuquerque Police Department. Assistant United States Attorney Patrick E. Cordova prosecuted the case.

# # #

Updated June 10, 2024

PRESS RELEASE

Albuquerque Man Pleads Guilty to Manufacturing and Selling Machinegun Conversion Devices

Wednesday, June 12, 2024Share

For Immediate Release

U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of New Mexico

ALBUQUERQUE – An Albuquerque man pleaded guilty in federal court to engaging in the business of dealing firearms without a license and possession of a machine gun conversion device.

According to court documents, in December 2022, the ATF identified an Instagram user as possibly being in possession of and selling illegal machine gun conversion devices, which modify firearms to make them fire fully automatic. The ATF identified the user as Joe Jasso, 20, by the distinctive tattoo on his hand.

In January 2023, the account was deleted.

A new Instagram account was identified by the ATF in January 2023, which appeared to belong to Jasso based on the same hand tattoos being visible on posts on the account.

On February 3, 2023, undercover detectives from the Albuquerque Police Department contacted Jasso through Instagram and set up a controlled purchase of machine gun conversion devices from Jasso and his mother, Rachael Jasso. During the transaction, Jasso explained to the undercover detective how to install the conversion device onto a firearm and confirmed that it would allow the firearm to shoot fully automatic. Jasso also offered to obtain an assault rifle auto sear to sell to the undercover officer.

On February 16, 2023, federal law enforcement agents and local law enforcement executed a search warrant at Jasso’s residence in Albuquerque. Inside the home, law enforcement located and seized:

• Approximately ten firearms,
• Five machine gun conversion devices,
• A large amount of ammunition,
• Numerous ammunition magazines (both loaded and unloaded), and
• A 3D printer.

As part of his guilty plea, Jasso admitted he knew the conversion devices met the federal definition of a firearm and that he did not have a license to engage in the business of selling firearms.

The Court ordered that Jasso remain in custody pending sentencing, which has not been scheduled.

At sentencing, Jasso faces up to 10 years in prison. Upon his release from prison, Jasso will be subject to up to three years of supervised release.

Jasso’s co-defendant, Rachel Jasso, is currently scheduled to stand trial on July 8, 2024.

U.S. Attorney Alexander M.M. Uballez and Brendan Iber, Special Agent in Charge of the Phoenix Field Division of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, made the announcement today.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives investigated this case with assistance from the Albuquerque Police Department. Assistant U.S. Attorney Samuel A. Hurtado is prosecuting the case.

Machine gun conversion devices and auto sears are illegal devices designed to modify a semi-automatic firearm so it is capable of fully automatic fire, that is, continuous firing with a single trigger pull. The possession, manufacture, and/or sale of machine gun conversion devices without proper licensing is a federal offense punishable by severe penalties, including up to 10 years in prison and fines up to $250,000. The use of machinegun conversion devices poses a significant public safety risk, as they transform semi-automatic firearms into dangerous machine guns capable of causing catastrophic harm.

# # #

Updated June 12, 2024

ABQ GUNS IS PROUD TO HELP OUR GOOD FRIEND LINDSEY MCMULLEN GOFUNDME EFFORTS

WE ARE DONATING ALL PROCEEDS FOR THE NEW ABQ GUNS T-SHIRT DESIGN

WE ARE ASKING FOR A $10.00 OR MORE DONATION FOR EACH SHIRT.

In June of 2021, Lindsey started having right side numbness of her entire body. After being taken to the ER and no scans done, the doctor wrote it off and said to see her primary care. The primary care doctor referred her to neurology, where it was found through an EEG that there was sharp brain activity in December 2021. She was referred to a neurosurgeon, which identified through an MRI a grade 2 astrocytoma glioma in February 2022. In March of 2022, Lindsey underwent an awake craniotomy, which removed 40% of the tumor. There were several complications, and the biopsy came back as cancerous. The tumor being a grade 2 and slow growing, Lindsey and Alec had decided to forego treatment for the time being. During this time, they had their daughter Siena during a high risk pregnancy with multiple grand mal seizures. 3 months after Siena was born, Lindsey had an MRI which showed that the tumor was growing and decided to start seeking treatment. Alec, Lindsey and Siena went out to Houston to MD Anderson to see about getting Proton Therapy Radiation, and after a month battle finally got in. Starting November 6th, Lindsey has undergone 28 radiation treatments at the Proton Center in Houston and will return to Houston for an MRI in January to see how successful treatment was. She will continue following with MD Anderson every few month for the foreseeable future.

We have setup this GoFundMe to help Alec, Lindsey and Siena to help fund Proton Radiation Therapy, as it is an extremely expensive and specialized treatment. There are only 30 $100 million proton machines in the US, and the only radiation treatment that specializes in saving eloquent tissue in the brain. They ask for continued prayers and are extremely appreciative of any and all financial contributions.

PLEASE DONATE TO LINDSEY’S MEDICAL EXPENCES

Democrats Turned New Mexico into the Most Dangerous State in the Nation

Did you know?   New Mexico’s Democratic leadership has hit another milestone for the worst!   >>>New Mexico is officially the #1 most dangerous state in America, according to a ranking by U.S. News & World Report.

Enter the ROSE Raffle with Women for Gun Rights and You Could Win A HUGE P365-ROSE Package! The women’s voice is mission critical to safeguarding the 2nd Amendment.  The gun control lobby utilizes women’s voices to call for more restrictions.  Women for Gun Rights counters them, with poise, and builds bridges to those who are not familiar with our firearms community or their own constitutionally protected rights.  WGR is working diligently to influence their friends, families, communities and legislators to change the narrative around firearms and firearms owners.     Please join SIG SAUER in giving them a hand by purchasing a ticket for this fantastic ROSE package raffle! YOU COULD WIN THIS PACKAGE VALUED AT $2,000:★ P365-ROSE with a ROMEO-X Red Dot Sight signed by Lena Miculek★ Box of ROSE 9MM practice ammo★ ROSE shooting glasses and electronic ear protection★ P365-ROSE Modular Hook and Loop CrossBreed Holster★ ROSE Off-Body Carry Fanny Pack★ ROSE hoodie★ ROSE water bottle and straw tumbler from CamelbakRaffle winner will be announced on May 19th at the SIG SAUER booth inside the NRA Annual Meeting in Dallas, Texas. ENTER THE RAFFLE NOW If you have a story to share of why you support the 2nd Amendment or want to become a delegate, it’s free to join the Women for Gun Rights. JOIN WOMEN FOR GUN RIGHTS HERE

FIREARMS  • AMMUNITION  • ELECTRO-OPTICS  • SUPPRESSORS  • AIRGUNS  • TRAINING

Terms and conditions: Some age and shipping restrictions may apply. See website for complete details. All trademarks, service marks, trade names, trade dress, product names and logos appearing in this email are the property of their respective owners. No trademark or service mark appearing in this email may be used without the prior written consent of the mark’s owner. We are sending this email because you have either registered your firearm with us, registered for our newsletters, or entered one of our promotions. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, as this email address is used only for sending information about special promotions or surveys. This mailbox is not monitored. If you need assistance or have questions regarding our products or services, please call (603)-610-3000 option 1, and we will be happy to assist you. Thank you.SIG SAUER Inc.,72 Pease Boulevard, Newington, NH 03801(603) 610-3000sigsauer.com

Complements of ABQ GUNS!!! GOOD LUCK EVERYONE!!!

SOCIALIST NM Governor Announces Special Session on “Public Safety” To Begin July 18

Dear Second Amendment Supporters: Yesterday, anti-gun Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham announced that she is convening lawmakers in Santa Fe for a special legislative session beginning July 18 to address “public safety” issues.  This, in spite of the fact that she just made the recent 30-day budget session a de facto special session on crime-related legislation (most of which progressive lawmakers defeated) and gun control proposals (most of which failed, including gun bans, magazine limits, restrictions on purchase and possession of firearms by young adults, and attacks on firearms industry members.)  Anti-gun bills which did pass and she signed into law — the 7-day waiting period on firearms purchases and ban on open carry at polling places — haven’t even taken effect yet (both do so on May 15.) Lujan Grisham has publicly stated that she wants lawmakers to consider legislation restricting panhandling, increasing the penalty for felons in possession of firearms, determining the competency of criminal defendants, and assuring delivery of mental health services to at-risk individuals during this special session.  The Santa Fe New Mexican is reporting that gun control measures and pretrial detention are off the table until, presumably, the 60-day session in 2025. Gun owners must remain vigilant!  We’ve shared with you what is being reported today, but the special session is still three months away.  This governor has never passed up an opportunity to push for more restrictions on your Second Amendment rights or conjure up an “emergency” that requires immediate executive or legislative action on firearms.  Please contact legislative leadership and use the button below to email your State Senator and State Representative and tell them enough is enough — no more gun control in the July Special Session. Senate Majority Leader Peter Wirth peter.wirth@nmlegis.gov House Speaker Javier Martinez javier.martinez@nmlegis.gov

On podcast, MLG admits to buying votes and talks about the ‘New World Order’

By Gregory Hollister / March 7, 2024 / New Mexico, News, Politics

In a recent podcast interview with Greg Sargent of “The New Republic,” a far-leftist group, Democrat New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham stirred controversy with statements admitting to blatant voter manipulation and hypocrisy on key issues. Amidst an array of contentious topics, Lujan Grisham’s remarks on the “New World Order” and her reflections on policy and demographic responses drew particular attention.

Lujan Grisham, who made the controversial decision to remove National Guard troops from the border early in her tenure, said during the interview that more politicians need to embrace unconstitutional public health orders to get issues like immigration fixed. 

“I think southwestern governors can show an impact in workforce development, in public safety and security, and in ways that are more meaningful but can sort of set the model in the same way. Not every state should or will embrace a public health order to deal with particular high-cost, high-stakes gun violence emergencies in their communities. But I think you’ll see them talk about it in more of a public health context, and I think this way, it isn’t a fight between extremism on either side of an issue,” she said.

The governor added, “The same issues are expected to be addressed here, and Hispanics and Latinos both want that. For example, if I had to wait in line to come here, then other people should too. But they also recognize you can’t get a visa anymore. They recognize that all of the drama about all the nefarious activity at the border — they recognize that more of that nefarious activity is organized crime at ports of entry.” 

However, she nor her legislative allies have proposed any legislative action to alleviate the border issue. At the same time, political leaders like State Rep. John Block (R-Alamogordo) have led the Republican effort to help secure the state’s border, which has fallen on deaf ears to Democrats in the Legislature.

Her interview highlighted what many see as a pattern of failing to address the tangible crisis at the border — a crisis amplified by her early actions as governor, which directly contributed to the current state of affairs.

“I’m not gonna give it up now for this extremism effort in this country and around the world,” Grisham declared, framing her political stances as a fight against what she labeled as a rise in fascism and sexism.

It is notable that the governor repeatedly tried to declare Republicans as “extreme,” while during her tenure as governor, she has pushed for the most extremist policies in the country, including abortion up-to-birth laws, executive orders and bills banning all gun possession, hiking prices on gas, and enacting socialist programs that are costing taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars annually.

“I see it in my state with, you know, MAGA extremists, not with everyone else, but certainly there. And I can see that the risks are greater for me as I campaign or go out publicly. They are really angry, but I think it’s intimidation and insecurity and a New World Order, which I hate using that language. But we’re talking about fascism and sexism and inequality, and I think, uh, it somehow makes some people feel better about themselves. And Trump plays into that, I think, very effectively, but it’s incredibly dangerous,” she told Sargent.

When asked about citizens exercising the right to vote and potential fears of violence during the 2024 elections, Lujan Grisham said, “I hope not, but I don’t think it’s outside the realm of possibilities. Just look at the Trump era pre-, during, and post-COVID. Anyone making any policy decisions was at risk. Certainly, I was threatened. Any of our marches or protests were met with far too many individuals who were very angry and were carrying automatic weapons and rifles that does not create an environment where people can, in fact, peacefully protest. That level of intimidation is purposeful.”

It is worth noting that the governor applauded Black Lives Matter/Antifa rioters who protested in the streets and bucked her own public health orders during her years-long COVID-19 lockdown. In her above statement, she also incorrectly claims that New Mexicans counter-protested these marches and riots with “automatic weapons,” which did not happen. Automatic weapons are illegal in the United States, per federal law. 

The governor did not shy away from touting her socialist educational policies, implying that initiatives such as “free” college and pre-k were key to garnering votes, particularly from younger demographics. She said, “So, in New Mexico, free college, free daycare, free universal pre-k, leaning in to make sure that every New Mexican reads, not just at but above grade average, which is something we haven’t leaned into.”

She then admitted, “And I think with the rhetoric with every other issue except the economy, Biden needs to lean in hard for his successes there. He needs to lean in hard for education. I will tell you, I got voters in record numbers — younger voters — because of free college,” Lujan Grisham stated, in an admission that these socialist programs are actually a mechanism to buy votes.

Her commentary also ventured into the realm of identity politics, criticizing Hispanic men who didn’t support her while at the same time trying to court their votes. “I had economic messaging work to do with Hispanic men, in particular, in rural areas,” she confessed, acknowledging a need to recalibrate her strategy to appeal to this demographic.

The interview also saw Lujan Grisham attacking her own constituency, specifically Hispanic men in rural areas, suggesting that their disapproval of her stemmed from outdated sexist ideologies supposedly revived by the Trump era. She accused MAGA supporters of sexism and intimidation, categorizing their political passion as “MAGA fury” and claiming it was rooted in a fear of losing power.

Moreover, Lujan Grisham criticized the GOP’s approach to immigration, framing it as failure and fear-mongering. “They would actually want a candidate not to poison the debate and not to create fear and anger, which is racist, but to actually resolve some of the problems,” she said, trying to position herself as the more reasonable and solution-oriented leader despite her administration flatly ignoring border policies.

Also, in the interview, Sargent asked the governor about the bill she just signed, S.B. 5, banning some guns at polling places and if it was meant to increase public safety, specifically at the polls.

She responded, “Certainly not in the day-to-day violence that we’re seeing playing out in far too many communities in New Mexico. But if you’re gonna take measures and you’re gonna focus on — we all have a constitutional right to be safe at work and at our churches, grocery stores, movie theaters, and homes and neighborhoods, then I think it’s really valuable we have this piece of legislation that I signed into law yesterday that says ‘Look, we care about polling workers and we care about creating safe spaces for people to exercise their right and privilege to vote.’”

It is unclear why the governor is now creating new constitutional “rights” when she herself claimed while signing an illegal, anti-gun executive order that no constitutional right, including her oath of office, is “absolute.” She also openly admitted that the anti-gun law relating to polling places would “certainly not” help alleviate crime, proving it was just another Democrat feel-good messaging bill.

The governor’s dialogue with Sargent revealed much about her political strategy and low views about her constituents. Her candidness may resonate with the fringes of her base. However, her words appear to only evidence her prioritization of partisanship and political gamesmanship over the substantive issues facing New Mexico and the nation.

Copyright © 2024 Piñon Post